top of page

DSA's Takeover of Democratic Party Abetted by an Open Door

10 minutes ago
4 min read

As published in Newsmax.

October 27, 2026.



Democratic Socialists of America's Takeover of Democratic Party an Inside Job



Conventional wisdom paints a picture of mainstream Democrats locked in a struggle with a socialist wing bent on hijacking the party.


History tells a different story.


What we are witnessing is the culmination of a transformation in the Democratic Party's governing agenda that began more than 100 years ago.


Democratic leaders are signaling that the ideological ground has shifted.


Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., calls his party a "big tent."

He praises antisemitic Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, a Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) supporter, for bringing "new energy and new talent" into the party.


House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., when asked whether there is room in the Democratic Party for Zohran Mamdani's socialist views and hatred toward Israel, responded, "The bigger the tent, the more likely it is that we can reach the greatest number of Americans."


These are not the words of leaders confronting an ideological threat.


Neither suggested socialism or Marxism departs from Democratic Party principles.


The message is simple, "Welcome aboard!"


Why?


Because they share a similar view of political power and government's role.


The American constitutional system was designed to divide and restrain power through federalism, checks and balances, separation of powers, and individual rights.


The Democratic establishment and its socialist allies increasingly view those restraints not as safeguards of liberty but as obstacles to political progress.


Their disagreements concern the pace of change and messaging, not the centralization of control in Washington.


The roots of this ideology stretch back more than a century.


President Woodrow Wilson laid the intellectual foundation for modern progressivism, viewing constitutional limits as impediments to efficient governance and favoring authority concentrated in professional administrators.


President Franklin D.Roosevelt expanded that vision through the New Deal’s unprecedented growth of federal and bureaucratic power.


Wilson, Roosevelt, Obama, Schumer, and Mamdani share a common belief: Political progress and social justice require a strong central authority capable of directing society.


Constitutional restraints stand in the way.


Under Barack Obama, Washington expanded its authority over healthcare through the Affordable Care Act (ACA), increasing federal control over private insurance markets affecting millions.


When Congress became an obstacle, the administration relied on executive action to advance policy objectives.


In 2020, Democratic leaders consolidated behind Joe Biden after Sen. Bernie Sanders emerged as a frontrunner, believing Sanders's messaging would cost them power. Sanders lost the nomination. Much of his agenda did not.


Under Joe Biden, Democrats continued advancing federal authority, wealth redistribution, and government-directed social change.


They canceled $184 billion in student debt, expanded federal economic intervention through the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), supported a billionaire tax, and endorsed the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact as an Electoral College workaround.


Senior Democrats continue to entertain U.S. Supreme Court expansion.


Culturally, they advance the identity politics of oppression and victimhood, reject traditional biological norms, and have enabled the mainstreaming of antisemitic narratives, including accusations that Israel is committing genocide.


By the time the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) emerged as a national force, the groundwork had been laid.


The distinction between the Democratic establishment and its socialist left became one of marketing and timing rather than direction.


The DSA's 2026 platform reveals the destination.


It calls for abolishing the Electoral College and the Senate, replacing the presidency and Supreme Court, eliminating capitalism, nationalizing major industries, imposing wealth taxes, guaranteeing employment, and government-funded housing, healthcare, and education.


It endorses open borders, defunding the police and prisons, citizenship for illegal immigrants, and the elimination of Israel.


The Green New Deal, which the party adopted, is marketed as an environmental policy.


Yet principal architect Saikat Chakrabarti, former chief of staff to DSA member Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., acknowledged a broader objective, "The interesting thing about the Green New Deal is. . . we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing."


The goal is economic restructuring, shifting decisions from individuals, businesses, and markets to political officials and agencies in Washington.


The DSA openly advocates government-run healthcare.


Democratic leaders from Obama to Biden to Schumer have backed a federal "public option," a government insurance plan operating alongside private coverage, that many supporters view as a pathway to a single-payer system directed from Washington.


The assumptions now mainstreaming in the DSA platform reflect a Marxist perspective: Existing institutions are engines of oppression and inequality that require reconstruction rather than reform.


The DSA officially calls itself "democratic socialist," yet its platform declares, "We need a new political system," and advances classic Marxist goals of eliminating capitalism and subordinating key institutions to working-class political power.


A 2025 Heartland Institute-Rasmussen survey found 53% of likely voters ages 18 to 39 want a democratic socialist to win the 2028 presidential election. Seventy-six percent support nationalizing major industries, including healthcare, energy, and technology.


Schumer's and Jeffries's "big tent" comments reflect political reality.


They may disagree on tactics, but both the DSA and the Democratic Party move in the same policy direction. The question is how much power Americans are willing to transfer to the administrative state.


In 1967, Ronald Reagan warned that "freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.


A constitutional republic depends not only on what government can provide but on what government must never be allowed to control.


The Democratic Party's transformation has unfolded over decades. The DSA did not create the intellectual currents shaping the party today. It simply walked through an open door.






Comments


Want to receive Ziva's articles when they are published?

   Recommended Web Sites
   Who's Behind The Blog
Search By Tags

Ziva Has Been Featured In

bottom of page